<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Islamic Monthly</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com</link>
	<description>Politics, Culture, Society.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 12:20:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Rant</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-rant-3/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-rant-3</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-rant-3/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 02:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TheIslamic Monthly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Special Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3326</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-rant-3/" title="wajahat overheard"><img title="wajahat overheard" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/wajahat-overheard.jpg" alt="Facebook Rant" width="200" height="133" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		Obama&#8217;s counter terrorism speech today: impressive in some respects, but lackluster in offering transparency and answering lingering, troubling questions of accountability.  Wajahat Ali writes and reflects on his facebook page: - Obama: Muslims are a &#8220;fundamental part of American family&#8221; &#38; journalists shouldn&#8217;t be at legal risk, so we&#8217;ll just [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-rant-3/" title="wajahat overheard"><img title="wajahat overheard" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/wajahat-overheard.jpg" alt="Facebook Rant" width="200" height="133" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/wajahat-overheard.jpg"><img class="size-full wp-image-3327 alignleft" alt="wajahat overheard" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/wajahat-overheard.jpg" width="275" height="183" /></a>Obama's counter terrorism speech today: impressive in some respects, but lackluster in offering transparency and answering lingering, troubling questions of accountability.  Wajahat Ali writes and reflects on his facebook page:

- Obama: Muslims are a "fundamental part of American family" &amp; journalists shouldn't be at legal risk, so we'll just spy on both in keeping with our new American traditions.

- Obama: I love the smell of drone napalm in the morning, smells like victory... in a "boundless, global war on terror" that I don't support

- So, Obama disagrees w/ Gitmo, spying on journalists, extrajudicial killings, &amp; seeing Muslim citizens as suspects, but allows it to happen

- Code Pink activists, like the one who interrupted Obama's speech, are like the most aggressive rishta aunties on earth - they'll crash any party and make their voices heard.

- Even if drones are allegedly "superior" &amp; less prone to mistakes, the policy doesn't take into account the humiliation &amp; anger they inspire

- In every Muslim country I've visited nothing inspired more resentment, frustration, and humiliation about U.S. policy than drone strikes.

- If Obama agrees with most of the criticisms why does his administration continue implementing and supporting the policies?

- We targeted and assassinated Anwar Awlaki because he was waging war against Americans, but why did we commit an extra-judicial murder of his innocent 16 year old son? Still waiting to hear the justification for that one...

- If U.S. citizens are placed on kill lists, how can they ask to be removed? Especially, when they won't know they're on a kill list until a drone has dropped a bomb on their head - which, you know, kind of sucks.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-rant-3/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Star Trek Into Islam</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/star-trek-into-islam/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=star-trek-into-islam</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/star-trek-into-islam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:29:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Haroon Moghul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Area5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3191</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Senior Editor Haroon Moghul is at the movies&#8230;and it&#8217;s Star Trek&#8230;and Islam on his mind.  Here is his four part commentary Part 1. Why Do We Want To Star Trek? Part 2. Star Trek Into Redundance Part 3. A Photon Torpedo, a Drone, and the War on Terror Part 4. [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Senior Editor Haroon Moghul is at the movies...and it's Star Trek...and Islam on his mind.  Here is his four part commentary
<div style="text-align: left;">Part 1. Why Do We Want To Star Trek?</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Part 2. Star Trek Into Redundance</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Part 3. A Photon Torpedo, a Drone, and the War on Terror</div>
<div style="text-align: left;">Part 4. Are There Mosques on the Enterprise?</div>
<div></div>
<div>note: upload in progress, please check back momentarily! (embed video)</div>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/star-trek-into-islam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TIM EXCLUSIVE: Boston Marathon Saudi &#8220;Suspect&#8221; Speaks Out</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/exclusive-interview-with-the-saudi-man-from-boston/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=exclusive-interview-with-the-saudi-man-from-boston</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/exclusive-interview-with-the-saudi-man-from-boston/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 05:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>The Editor's Desk</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3148</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/exclusive-interview-with-the-saudi-man-from-boston/" title="Boston"><img title="Boston" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/finish-boston.jpg" alt="TIM EXCLUSIVE: Boston Marathon Saudi &quot;Suspect&quot; Speaks Out" width="200" height="97" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		Abdulrahman Ali Alharbi In His Own Voice Interviewed by Amina Chaudary, TIM Editor-in-Chief, in Boston, MA Read the transcript here. &#160; What Really Happened?  The Bomb, The FBI and The Media by: Amina Chaudary Since the tragic Boston bombings, the news media have been saturated with stories: about the victims, [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/exclusive-interview-with-the-saudi-man-from-boston/" title="Boston"><img title="Boston" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/finish-boston.jpg" alt="TIM EXCLUSIVE: Boston Marathon Saudi &quot;Suspect&quot; Speaks Out" width="200" height="97" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		<h2>Abdulrahman Ali Alharbi In His Own Voice</h2>
Interviewed by Amina Chaudary, TIM Editor-in-Chief, in Boston, MA
<p style="text-align: center;"><img alt="Boston Finish" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/finish-boston.jpg" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/TIMcastsLogo.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-723 aligncenter" alt="TIMcasts" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/TIMcastsLogo.png" width="127" height="31" /></a></p>
<p style="margin:auto; width: 424px;"><script id="prx-p97080-embed" type="text/javascript" src="http://www.prx.org/p/97080/embed.js?size=small"></script></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://wp.me/p3j3qB-OO" target="_blank"> Read the transcript here.</a></p>
&nbsp;
<h2 style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>What Really Happened? </strong></span></h2>
<h2 style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>The Bomb, The FBI and The Media</strong></span></h2>
<h2 style="text-align: left;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: 13px; font-weight: normal;">by: Amina Chaudary</span></h2>

<p style="font-size: 16px;">Since the tragic Boston bombings, the news media have been saturated with stories: about the victims, about the runners and about the bombers. But one important story still needs to be told: That of the Saudi man-or-suspect-or-person-of-interest identified in the immediate aftermath of the bombings who was eventually determined to be only a witness.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">His name is Abdulrahman Ali Alharbi, a Saudi national who won a full scholarship from Saudi Arabia to study in America. He arrived here on a student visa in February 2012 to study English for a year before applying for college. He describes himself as shy and incredibly focused on his studies and he likes to stay out of the limelight. His friends in Boston also describe him as easy-going, good humored and good hearted.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">He was on his way to meet friends for lunch when he was injured by the second explosion at the marathon finish line. The force of the explosion threw him to the street, tearing his jeans and covering him in the blood of other injured people around him. He suffered from burn wounds on his head, back and legs. He did not have burn marks on his hands as many news organizations reported that made bystanders suspect him. After interviewing Alharbi, we can now understand there to be two distinct versions of the story: what the media said about him referencing “sources” and “authorities,” and what he exclusively told The Islamic Monthly (TIM).</p>



<p style="font-size: 16px;">At 4:28 p.m. on Marathon Monday, less than two hours after the explosions, <a href="http://www.nypost.com/p/news/national/authorities_under_suspect_guard_y2m8cJO29uC2PDGIjYBalO">the New York Post</a> was the first to announce that this individual was “a suspect” and “under guard.” The same report also erroneously stated that authorities said 12 people had been killed and up to 50 injured. The facts were clearly not available, but the media seemed far too excited about the potential suspect to temper itself. That evening, CBS correspondent and former FBI associate director John Miller <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=50144911n">stated</a> that after the bombs went off, a spectator noticed that Alharbi was “acting suspiciously” and tackled him to the ground; other media reports continued this same narrative, citing these early, and what we now know to be erroneous, reports.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">In this TIM exclusive, Alharbi responds: “No, no one arrested me, no one tackled me. All the people were trying to escape from what happened because they realized that there was something dangerous [at] the finish line.”</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">He said that no one looked at him suspiciously and that a runner noticed him walking in the street covered in blood and offered to help him walk. A police officer directed him, and all the other injured capable of walking, to the ambulances. The runner helped him on the emergency vehicle, but three other officers jumped on as well.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">Within a few minutes of arriving at the hospital, the FBI and Boston Police surrounded his bed. “All the police officers and the FBI … and all the nurses and all the doctors were staring at me … I was looking [at] them like, is it because of the color of my skin or is it because of the name of my country?”<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/colorofmyskintext.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3154" style="margin: 15px 10px;" alt="colorofmyskintext" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/colorofmyskintext.png" width="255" height="190" /></a></p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">He was under guard and unable to communicate with any friends or family for the first 24 hours. His father, residing in Saudi Arabia, found out about his injury and subsequent questioning through Twitter. Abdulrahman remained cooperative with the FBI but reflects at his shock and confusion over how he was accused of the attack.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">By Monday evening, the media discovered his full address and publicized it while filming the FBI search of his apartment. By early Tuesday, reports of his full name and photos from his Facebook account were circulated, some citing that it was first released by the conservative website <a href="http://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2013/04/16/saudi-national-just-one-of-multiple-leads-n1569117">Townhall</a>. However, we found that it was first reported by <a href="http://nation.foxnews.com/boston-marathon-explosion/2013/04/15/report-multiple-people-injured-explosions-boston-marathon">Fox News</a>, citing an unnamed source who released Alharbi’s name to them.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">With regards to the questioning, Alharbi says of the FBI that “I still don’t blame them to this moment” but when watching the media report about him within 24 hours of the bombing he reflected that at the time he said “but what [am I] going to do… after I [am] discharged from the hospital? It was very scary moment.”<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/blametext.png"><img class="size-full wp-image-3156 alignright" style="margin: 10px 15px;" alt="blametext" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/blametext.png" width="255" height="190" /></a></p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">By the next day, it was clear that Alharbi was just a witness and among the injured. <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/injured-saudi-is-a-witness-not-a-suspect-in-boston-bombing/2013/04/16/791de708-a6ad-11e2-b029-8fb7e977ef71_story.html">The Washington Post</a> and <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/report-saudi-man-boston-suspect-article-1.1318272">New York Daily News</a> exonerated him, and others soon followed, albeit with large photos of him published alongside their pieces. But the change in official status did not temper the media speculation. For days after he was discharged from the hospital media pundits incorrectly reported that he was put on a terrorist watch list and <a href="http://www.glennbeck.com/2013/04/18/breaking-saudi-student-connected-to-boston-marathon-bombing-set-to-be-deported-under-security-related-grounds-connected-to-terrorist-activities/">deported</a>. Other accusations were also made referencing his name appearing in google searches as proof of his links to terrorism or a larger US-Saudi conspiracy (note: on linkedin.com alone there are 26 professionals with the exact same first and last name spelling as Abdulrahman Alharbi). In response, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-250_162-57580936/napolitano-immigration-bill-makes-america-more-secure/">stated</a> that Alharbi was at the wrong place at the wrong time. She confirmed that he was put on a terrorist watch list, but only while he was being questioned immediately after the bombing. When it was determined that he “had nothing to do with the bombings,” he was quickly removed from the list. “He was never a subject. He was never really a person of interest,” she said.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">TIM could not confirm from the FBI whether he was ever officially detained in the hospital or what his official status was during questioning. We could also not confirm from the FBI if it is standard protocol to add a person’s name, without completing the investigation, to a terrorist watch list in these types of crimes, only to be removed hours later. Nonetheless, several members of the media continued to write uncorroborated stories, based simply on the fact that the FBI questioned him for hours and that he was temporarily placed on the watch list.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">The many discrepancies between Alharbi’s story and what the media reported raise a number of unsettling questions. How exactly was the media given access to his full address and name? Is the FBI investigating this? Why is his official status as a suspect or person of interest or in custody still unclear?</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">When I called the FBI, I specifically inquired about Alharbi but the first contact drew a complete blank. “A Saudi national? I don’t recall there ever being a Saudi national.” But when I asked in what instance do the authorities release a person’s name in an investigation of this nature, they responded that, in compliance with the Privacy Act, they would release a name only if the public could be of help in the investigation. But it’s unclear how and when that determination may be made. The media was able to report about him less than two hours after the bombing. The FBI had not yet searched his apartment or questioned him in full, yet shortly thereafter the media had complete details about him: in name, residence and photos. The FBI did not officially release his name asking for the public’s help in specific reference to him, but as for what happened unofficially, we may never know.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">Several media networks fueled intense feelings of animosity and hatred toward Alharbi specifically and Arabs and Muslims in general, including focusing on Obama and Saudi conspiracy theories. Immediately after the bombings, <a href="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/comment/2013/04/the-saudi-marathon-man.html">the New Yorker</a> and <a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/i-fear-the-saudi-man/">The Islamic Monthly</a> published a defense of this innocent man, but that was about it. Everywhere else, racist commentaries, analysis and continued speculations expanded, and the defense of Alharbi was all but forgotten.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">Perhaps we have also forgotten Richard Jewell, the security guard who spotted and reported a suspicious bag in Atlanta during the 1996 Summer Olympics. Acting fast, he cordoned off crowds and saved many lives before the bomb went off. But a few days after the bombing, the FBI described Jewell as fitting the profile of a typical lone bomber who wanted to receive public attention. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution was the first to report that he was the bomber, and for months other media outlets maintained this description. While he was later exonerated, he found it difficult to <a href="http://www.accessnorthga.com/detail-pf.php?n=120185">live with the stigma</a> of that association, and he described the media <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2007/08/30/us/30jewell.html">“like piranha on a bleeding cow.”</a> No doubt, his universe was upended and he had a difficult time returning to a normal life, despite the fact that the Justice Department formally cleared his name. He died at the age of 44.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">Today, we see Alharbi suffering the effects of sensationalist (and often-times racist) media reports, enough to disturb him and prevent him from moving back to his home and resuming his normal life. He told us he received many hate messages, including one that read “sorry to hear about the powder burns on your hands from the bombs your friends set off in Boston. Also sorry to hear our government is wanting to deport your a$$. I would love to see your neck get stretched by a good ole fashion rope.”<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/doubleinjuredtext.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3158" style="margin: 15px 10px;" alt="doubleinjuredtext" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/doubleinjuredtext.png" width="255" height="190" /></a></p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">“I lost my privacy,” Alharbi said, adding “I am double injured from the explosion and the media.”</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">It is not clear, nor might it ever be, whether the FBI released his name. A nurse, doctor, custodian or anyone else in the hospital may have given his information to the press had they come across it from a chart or notepad lying around. But what is certain is that there were no reporters in the hospital, and within two hours of the bombing but before the FBI could conduct a proper search of Alharbi’s background, the media were learning a lot about him. What is also certain is that his name and ID were initially only with the FBI and authorities questioning him.</p>
<p style="font-size: 16px;">The point is that this could happen to anyone, at anytime for being at the wrong place at the wrong time, and looking the ‘wrong’ way. Given the Web’s permanence of information and the speed with which media can disseminate any information, however unverified, to drive its 24-hour news cycle, we must closely consider how we protect the innocent victims of these incidents, including people like Alharbi who was twice victimized through no fault of his own. He understood the importance of cooperating, but could not leave the hospital unidentified. The leak, regardless of where it came from, must be investigated and we must be sure this never happens again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/exclusive-interview-with-the-saudi-man-from-boston/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>EXCLUSIVE INTERVIEW: Boston Marathon &#8220;Saudi Man&#8221; transcript</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/exclusive-interview-saudi-man-transcript/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=exclusive-interview-saudi-man-transcript</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/exclusive-interview-saudi-man-transcript/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 04:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>TheIslamic Monthly Staff</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3150</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Transcript of the interview between Abdulrahman Alharbi and TIM Editor-in-Chief Amina Chaudary. Interview was conducted in Boston, MA. TIM:  Abdulrahman [Ali Alharbi] had heard about the marathon from his teacher. He was planning on meeting some friends for lunch and thought that, on his way to lunch, he would first [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[Transcript of the interview between Abdulrahman Alharbi and TIM Editor-in-Chief Amina Chaudary. Interview was conducted in Boston, MA.
<p style="text-align: left;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM:</strong>  <i>Abdulrahman [Ali Alharbi] had heard about the marathon from his teacher. He was planning on meeting some friends for lunch and thought that, on his way to lunch, he would first stop at the marathon. He took the subway toward the finish line. He saw runners who had already completed the run sitting there. He was a bit upset with himself for arriving so late but decided to continue walking up along Boylston Street to watch the other runners cross the finish line. After a few minutes, he thought he’d continue to walk ahead. With the finish line now behind him, he kept on walking. He was there for about 10 minutes.</i></span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>Abdulrahman Alharbi: </strong>Everything was normal.<i> </i>After I passed the finish line I heard an explosion or something. I looked behind me and I saw smoke. I thought that it was … fireworks, so I just wanted to continue walking. Then suddenly in just 6 seconds, the second explosion just, I don’t know if it was in front of me or behind me. And it threw me to the middle of the road. So I was really shocked for what happened to me.<i> </i></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I realized that my legs were a little bit hurt because all my jeans were [bloody]…I was bleeding a little bit in my legs but all my back was all [bloody] not because of my body but because of other people’s body.</p>
<strong>TIM:</strong> <strong>There were people around you who were bleeding? </strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> Yeah.</p>
<strong><span style="color: #000000;">TIM: What did you see when you were on the ground?</span></strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> I couldn’t see anything but I remember I saw, after the explosion, I saw a little part of, I don’t know if it was a little part of a body or a dog in front of me, but I don’t remember because it was really smoky around me.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I [was] really scared because I heard the first bomb, then the second bomb hurt me, then, I was really scared because there might be another one. Then, I just was walking and the people were crying “What happened, what happened?” I told them “I don’t know there was an explosion or something.”</p>
<strong><span style="color: #000000;">TIM: In one account that I read it said that somebody saw you running and then they tackled you.</span></strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> No, no one arrested me, no one tackled me, no. All the people were trying to escape from what happened because they realized that there was something dangerous in the finish line.</p>
<strong><span style="color: #ff0000;"><span style="color: #000000;">TIM: Did you notice anyone around you look at you in a particular way, or skeptically, because that’s also one of the stories that was reported.</span><i> </i></span></strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> No. I talked to two police officers. The first one told me, while he was walking, “Go down [the] street, go down [the] street! You’re gonna find [an] ambulance there.” Then, one of the runners realized that I am injured. He just tried to help me to walk to the police officer, and I told him “Talk to the police officer. He is going to help us. Where should I go.”He told me “Okay, okay, calm down. Everything is going to be fine, everything is going to be fine.” He told the ambulance he is injured from what happened.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">Few police man officers came with me from the event to the hospital.</p>
<strong>TIM: So, two police officers came in the ambulance with you?</strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> Three.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: Three came in the ambulance with you, and then all of the EMTs, the people who were helping you medically.<i> </i></strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> Yeah. They were really scared of me. I am injured, I don’t have anything and they asked me “What you have in your hand!” I told them “Nothing, it’s just a napkin!” and I throw it to them and they were like “ahh!”</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">They asked me couple of questions then I asked them “What happened?” They told me “We don’t know, but if you can tell us what happened?”</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I had no idea for what happened and what they were thinking about me. And I was just looking to my body and I was really shocked and trying to stop the bleeding in my nose.</p>
<strong><span style="color: #000000;">TIM narrative: Abdulrahman was transported, like many of the other victims that day to Brigham and Women’s Hospital. He was first taken in to the emergency room for immediate triage, and then moved upstairs to another room.</span></strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> All the police officers and the FBI and other guys, which I don’t know where they are from, and all the nurses and the doctors were staring at me.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: When you arrived?</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> Yeah, I was looking to them like is it because of the color of my skin or is it because of the name of my country? They were staring at me without anything, like they just guessing.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">While the nurses stop my bleeding, two minutes after I arrived at the hospital, after two minutes, the FBI came and other people, I don’t know who are they, but I realized that there are a lot. They were like in the line asking me “Where are you from?” “What’s your address?” “Where are you from?” “What’s your name?” “What’s your address?” I gave it to him. [But I was thinking], “Just wait a second they are helping me, the nurses, so just wait, I am injured.” So, they should have wait a little bit because I don’t know if I broke one of my bones. It was really scary. They were writing everything. I was trying to help them. I gave them everything I can.</p>
<strong><span style="color: #000000;">TIM: What else did they ask you for?</span></strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> They were asking me about my Facebook account.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: You gave them your password for your Facebook account?</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> Yeah.</p>
<strong><span style="color: #000000;">TIM: And they took it?</span></strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> They took everything.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: So there are 20 of them in your hospital room, all around your bed.</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>AA:</strong></span> All around the bed and in front of, they just was treating me like I did all these stuff.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I just said I should give my life to them.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: And they stayed how long in your hospital room, the whole day and the whole night?</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>AA:</strong></span> The whole night and the whole day even if I was sleeping, they were just in front of me.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: 20 of them?</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> Yeah. In the beginning there were a lot, but after four hours, only the FBI and the SWAT. It was really scary.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: At any point on Monday did they ask you if you have a lawyer?</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> On the second day, before they left the hospital, they [asked] me: “Do you have a lawyer?” I told them I don’t have, no, because I couldn’t talk to any one, even my friends or my family. And my father just knew about me from Twitter.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: Your father found out about you from Twitter? How?</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> They got it from the news, the American news, and they translated it to my language.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: That just said that there is a Saudi national…</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> That there is a Saudi national and his name is Abdulrahman Ali Alharbi.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">My friends asked the FBI, “What about our friend [Abdulrahman], we need to talk to him,” [and] they asked them if I am really injured badly. They [the FBI] said, “Your friend [is] just injured.” And they said, “Can we call him?” They said “No.” “Where is he?” “We cannot tell you where he is.” So, they really scared them. They thought that I am really injured.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">After 15 hours, or at 12 o’clock on Monday,</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM: Midnight?</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> Yup, I realized that they knew that I am not a suspect. I saw the media because I had a T.V. in my room. I saw that they wrote that: “21 [-year-old] Saudi national questioned.” I was asking myself and looking to the FBI and looking to the nurses. “Look! Why? Ok, I don’t blame you, about your questions, I don’t blame you. You are protecting your country but why did you show to the media that I am a suspect?” They [the media] said, Saudi man, suspect. Why? Did I do anything wrong? Do you have any evidence? Because as I heard from the media, that I was trying to escape. I wasn’t. And they said that the police officer arrested me because I was behaving suspiciously. No. All these lies. I don’t know from where did they get all these lies. But, I was really shocked and I saw all the nurses and the FBI were watching the T.V. and they just watched the T.V. And I realized that all the media in my apartment. They showed that and they did an interview with my roommate. And I was asking them: “You told me you were going to just search my apartment and I gave them the permission!” I still don’t blame them, to this moment. But what <span style="color: #000000;">I’m going to do after I [am] discharged from the hospital? It was a really scary moment. I looked to them they didn’t say anything.</span></p>
<strong><span style="color: #000000;">TIM: Nobody said to you that, “We didn’t tell them, we don’t know how they got this information”?</span></strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> They told me, “don’t look [at] the media.”</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM narrative: Sometime around midnight or after, they probably determined that he was innocent but it wasn’t until Tuesday afternoon that the media reported that he was just a witness. At the time that we interviewed him, he was still residing in a hotel room and had not received his stuff back from the FBI.</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> If my embassy didn’t help me out to rent a hotel, to eat, and all this stuff, I would be homeless or something. They took my wallet when I was in the hospital, so they took my credit card and everything I have. Everything. My laptop my iPad, my, even my camera. I couldn’t take my exams because I didn’t have any I.D.</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM narrative: But the most lingering problem that Abdulrahman faces is how he’s reported in the media. This is perhaps the moment in our interview when he became the most emotional. He said they sensationalized so many things about him and his life, and created false stories about his photos on his Facebook posts. This is an example he shares.</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> I got from somewhere, I don’t know from where, the Saudi flag and the American flag together and I wrote down in my language, “Thank God, I arrived [in] the U.S. after [a] long trip.” They [the media] translated that I said, “God is coming to the U.S.”</p>
<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM narrative: There were other stories that were made up about his photos. But humor aside, Abdulrahman remained quite shaken up when thinking about this.</strong></span>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> They are still reporting about me that I am [a] suspect, I am trying to disappear from the people. Many, many lies. I can’t imagine.</p>
<strong><span style="color: #000000;">TIM: Some people still are saying that you are behind the bombings, you think. </span></strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>AA:</strong> Yeah. There are a lot.<i> </i>I lost my privacy.</span></p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I have been trying to just forget it and all these stuff. … But I couldn’t forget, I am double injured from the explosion then from the media. So, it’s not easy to forget. Because you just going to write my name and search about [me], you are going to think I am from Al-Qaeda and, like terrible things.</p>
<strong><span style="color: #000000;">TIM: What do you think when people are saying he has connections to Al-Qaeda? What do you say to that?</span></strong>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;"><strong>AA:</strong> I’m just wondering from where, from where did they get all these lies? From where? But some of them said, “From our own sources.” Say it. “From our own documents.” Show it. Til this moment, show it. I need it, I hope to meet one of them just to show me where is your document that I am a suspect, that I am a terrorist.</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I read a lot of articles that talked about me very badly, and all the comments they said, “Get out from our country, you are a terrorist.” Actually it’s not easy to study at the U.S. You [have to first] get good grades in my high school and the other exams. So almost all of them really want to study at this country. It’s an amazing country. But I don’t know why they thought that Saudian are the terrorists. We really hate the terrorist people. They don’t compare between old man or a boy or 8 years old or 20 years old. They don’t care they just killed everyone. Why they thought that we are thinking with the terrorist. We really hate them. They are killing everyone. They don’t care. Why? Like what happened at the event [marathon]. Eight years old killed. Because of what? He didn’t do anything. He just one of the children. It’s really crazy. They killed in my country many people. They killed children and innocent lives. They are not Muslims. …</p>
<p style="padding-left: 30px;">I don’t know if I’m going to continue my studies. I came in to study my bachelor’s, I have full scholarship from my country, I don’t know if I am gonna be safe from other people. Because, I lost my privacy. So that’s why I am really scared. So it’s not [an] easy thing to just forget.</p>
<a name="_GoBack"></a><span style="color: #000000;"><strong>TIM narrative: As I interviewed Abdulrahman, and listened to his story, I saw a young man shaken up by the bombings, but having no time to really heal from it. </strong></span>

<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>When researching for this interview, I spent time going through the ways in which the media reported about him, what was said, how was it said. </strong></span>

<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>As we, in America send out messages that we are Boston Strong, we are healing as a country, we will overcome, we will persevere, I wonder, have we forgotten Abdulrahman and if we failed to realize that he, too, needs time to heal. And perhaps he may never find that since somehow the media exposed everything about him. In certain cases, suspects’ names are never released in case they turn out to be innocent. There is a reason behind that; if the name is released, the damage is irrevocable. Given the sensitivities towards acts of random violence like terrorism, what could be more damaging to someone than being labeled a terrorist?</strong></span>

<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>If a person has nothing to do with the bombings, then he is as much a victim as anyone else, so why is he twice victimized? And in reference to the hateful write-ups that are still being circulated about him, I wonder, have some of us in America allowed hate to cloud our judgment? Why are we forgetting the American values of love, compassion, loving thy neighbor? When the founding fathers built this country they embraced, embraced all and recognized that we can all play a part in making this country great. That we have all types of professions, of diverse backgrounds and religions including Arabs, and South Asians, and African Americans, and Muslims, who help make America great. In a world in which we are threatened at losing our status as the best country in the world, we should honor and embrace those who make this their home. Make this their country. Work hard and make America great.</strong></span>

<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Perhaps this should make us question more about what we hear and what we read, about the unidentified “sources” that people claim. When many in the rest of the world suffer from lack of freedom of press, have we taken this concept of freedom of press in the wrong direction? Have we forgotten to do due diligence in our reporting? Are we acting as automatons taking for granted the ways in which the news can go viral, but at the same time can destroy someone’s life given the Web’s permanence of information.</strong></span>

<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>At what point do we as a nation decide that the name of a person can be released into the public allowing for the presumption of guilt, practically destroying his ability to function as a normal member of society without a single shred of real evidence? And who should be held accountable for this failure and why is it that we are not holding them accountable? Who decided that giving this man’s information to the media was in any way a fair or just thing to do? What benefit was gained from releasing his name to the public? If there was none, which seems to be the case, why was it released?</strong></span>

<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>The focus of the public’s anger is justifiably towards those who perpetrated this crime. However the ambivalence with which we have treated an individual who was unjustifiably placed in the ire of the public is itself objectionable. </strong></span>

<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>This could have happened to anyone. It could have happened to any of us, and that is a fact that we should all be concerned about.</strong></span>

<span style="color: #000000;"><strong>Visit us on the Web, theislamicmonthly.com and tsaml.org.</strong></span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/exclusive-interview-saudi-man-transcript/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Traumatic Stains : I&#8217;m Not Dead Yet</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/test-gallery/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=test-gallery</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/test-gallery/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 17:35:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Hafsa Khizer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In Focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3127</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/test-gallery/" title="the danger of indifference"><img title="the danger of indifference" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com//traumatic-stainn/light-healing.jpg" alt="Traumatic Stains : I&#039;m Not Dead Yet" width="199" height="200" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/test-gallery/" title="the danger of indifference"><img title="the danger of indifference" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com//traumatic-stainn/light-healing.jpg" alt="Traumatic Stains : I&#039;m Not Dead Yet" width="199" height="200" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/test-gallery/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook Love</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-love/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=facebook-love</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-love/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 12:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zaki Barzinji</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Special Analysis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-love/" title="afeefa zaki"><img title="afeefa zaki" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/afeefa-zaki-300x225.jpg" alt="Facebook Love" width="200" height="150" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		About &#8220;the woman most people have a hard time believing is old enough to be my mother&#8221;, our own project manager Zaki Barzinji writes: Here are 15 out of 15 million things she taught me: 1 &#8211; &#8220;Hate&#8221; is almost never a necessary word to use. From &#8220;I hate you&#8221; to [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-love/" title="afeefa zaki"><img title="afeefa zaki" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/afeefa-zaki-300x225.jpg" alt="Facebook Love" width="200" height="150" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/afeefa-zaki.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-3114 alignleft" alt="afeefa zaki" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/afeefa-zaki-300x225.jpg" width="300" height="225" /></a>About "the woman most people have a hard time believing is old enough to be my mother", our own project manager Zaki Barzinji writes:

Here are 15 out of 15 million things she taught me:

1 - "Hate" is almost never a necessary word to use. From "I hate you" to "I hate onions", hold your tongue and soften your heart.

2 - There are times when you must be shamelessly idealistic, cynics be damned.

3 - Ray Bradbury, Imam Ali, Lao Tzu, Carl Sagan, Ghandi, and Bob Dylan are all perfectly acceptable teachers for a 2nd grader.

4 - When your child asks you "why?", the proper answer is always "why do YOU think?"

5 - Spirituality is an ever flowing river, not a stagnant isolated puddle.

6 - The more you see of the world, the more you will feel at home.

7 - PBS is really the only TV station worth watching

8 - There are people in as much need in your own backyard as there are thousands of miles away.

9 - When a child (or grown-up) throws a tantrum, sometimes the most potent neutralizer is a hug, not a slap.

10 - Unabashed cheesiness can be far more awesome than ironic snark.

11 - Some traditions should be kept, some should be discarded, and some should be created.

12 - Doubt is to be celebrated on the path to knowledge, not shunned as a step towards going astray.

13 - No one can ever truly despise you if you open yourself up enough to be understood.

14 - You are never alone in this world as long as you have family.

15 - A heart full of love and an ear prone to listening are the most powerful weapons in your arsenal for waging peace.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/facebook-love/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Telling our stories before they are hijacked: Exclusive interview with Emad Burnat</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/telling-our-stories-before-they-are-hijacked-exclusive-interview-with-emad-burnat/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=telling-our-stories-before-they-are-hijacked-exclusive-interview-with-emad-burnat</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/telling-our-stories-before-they-are-hijacked-exclusive-interview-with-emad-burnat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 May 2013 13:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Souheila Al-Jadda</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/telling-our-stories-before-they-are-hijacked-exclusive-interview-with-emad-burnat/" title="burnatslider"><img title="burnatslider" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/burnat-jpg_203338.jpg" alt="Telling our stories before they are hijacked: Exclusive interview with Emad Burnat" width="200" height="112" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		&#160; Emad Burnat is co-director of the Palestinian documentary “5 Broken Cameras”, a film about his village, Bil’in and the community’s non-violent resistance of the Israeli occupation. The film was nominated for an Oscar this year. In February, Emad Burnat, his wife and son, Gibreel, who is featured in the [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[
		<div>
		<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/telling-our-stories-before-they-are-hijacked-exclusive-interview-with-emad-burnat/" title="burnatslider"><img title="burnatslider" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/burnat-jpg_203338.jpg" alt="Telling our stories before they are hijacked: Exclusive interview with Emad Burnat" width="200" height="112" /></a>
		</div>
		<br/>
		&nbsp;
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/burnat-jpg_203338.jpg"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-3094" style="margin-bottom: 10px;" alt="burnat-jpg_203338" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/burnat-jpg_203338.jpg" width="630" height="354" /></a><strong>Emad Burnat</strong> is co-director of the Palestinian documentary <a href="http://www.kinolorber.com/5brokencameras/"><strong>“5 Broken Cameras”</strong></a>, a film about his village, Bil’in and the community’s non-violent resistance of the Israeli occupation. The film was nominated for an Oscar this year. In February, Emad Burnat, his wife and son, Gibreel, who is featured in the film, attended the Oscars ceremony. As they were traveling to the Oscars, the family was detained and questioned by customs officials at Los Angeles International Airport. Two months later, Emad Burnat returned to the United States, without incident, to accept a Media Award by the Muslim Public Affairs Council.</p>
The Islamic Monthly Editorial Director, Souheila Al-Jadda, spoke with Burnat about his film and the various responses he's encountered.

<b>The Islamic Monthly: Hopefully you didn’t have a hard time entering the United States this time?</b>

Emad Burnat: No not this time. I came to the United States this year 8 times. But just one time when I came to the LA airport for the Oscars, they made problems for me and my family. This time the Jordanians made problems…They made investigations and they questioned me.

<b>TIM: Why did that happen?</b>

EB: I think what happened to me in the United States last time is a very small example of what has happened to me in Palestine or to my people in everyday life. But it is very strange for me to get the same treatment by the Jordanians.

<b>TIM: Do you think that they don’t like that you are exposing Israeli practices?</b>

EB: No they do this to Palestinians not just to me.

<b>TIM: How has your film been received worldwide?</b>

EB: The reaction and impact was very good. People are moved and touched by the story. Many people were shocked by the film. The film was released all over the world and shown all over the world and it is still going. It shows the reality and truth of our lives.

<b>TIM: What about in Israel? How was the reaction to the film there?</b>

EB: The film was shown in Israel many times, in the cinema, on TV, in different cities. I have been there once for the festival, that’s all. But I know there was good reaction from the people in Israel. But at the same time there were many bad reactions. Most of the reactions were bad against the film and against my village Bili’in and against the Palestinians.

<b>TIM: I read that some soldiers shown in the film are suing you. Is that ongoing?</b>

<a name="_GoBack"></a>EB: Yes, the soldiers were talking about opening a case because I made this film. I told them, I told the TV station to make a live interview with me and the soldiers to talk about this, about why the soldiers are in the film. So I told them I live in my village and I did this film about my life and my village. And they came to my house and to my village. So if they have a problem they don’t need to come to my village.

<b>TIM: You are obviously continuing to film and use your camera to document what is happening still. Does your wife support you in this?</b>

EB: Of course, my wife supported me all the way. My camera is my weapon. I know the camera is a very strong witness. So what I have done with the camera, you see how it is going everywhere. The people outside are getting to know more about reality and about our lives. This is what’s important. My wife was supporting me all the way but at the same time she was worried about me because I was following the events everyday, 24 hours filming. I put my life in risky situations many times. I have been arrested. I have been under house arrest outside my village far from my family. So I was suffering and they were suffering. So, she wanted me to stop because she knows she wants me to be safe with the kids and the family.

<b>TIM: Do you feel that the therapy of filming has worked for you? Have you completed your objective and what do you want to do more?</b>

EB: My goal for this film was to reach the people and to show the film everywhere to the people who don’t know anything and have no idea about the situation or they are confused about the Palestinian-Israeli situation. But the film is still going on everywhere. I think my goal is to reach the people and make change. I need to make a good future for my kids and the next generation. For this reason, I made this film and I will continue filming.
<h1 style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/hijacktext2.png"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-3097" style="margin-left: 10px;" alt="hijacktext" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/hijacktext2.png" width="255" height="185" /></a></h1>
<b>TIM: Do you think any of your sons will carry your career path and torch of struggle?</b>

EB: I think this is a very effective way to use the camera and the arts to make documentaries about our lives. Because we should tell our stories before anyone hijacks them. My son is filming also when I am traveling. I taught him filming and I hope he can keep filming and make films in the future.

<b>TIM: Gibreel?</b>

EB: Not Gibreel, my second son, Taqideen.

<b>TIM: We have seen a lot of violence against you and your villagers. Do you think the non-violent movement is gaining ground in Palestine or do you think it’s a small sector that hasn’t able to accomplish its goals?</b>

EB: I think if we speak of non-violence, it is not a new way in Palestine. We have been struggling this way for a long time. If you remember the first Intifada, it was a popular intifada and it was an unarmed Intifada, non-violent and peaceful. And we are still going on. There are many villages and towns doing the same thing. Because the media always focus on the violence and never focuses on the non-violence, so people don’t know anything about the non-violent resistance. My village became a symbol for the community for this way, the non-violent way. Not because it’s new in my village. It’s happened before in other towns and other villages, since the 80s--but because of the creative ideas of the non-violent resistance.

<a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/wewanttext.png"><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-3099" style="margin-right: 10px; margin-bottom: 10px;" alt="wewanttext" src="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/wewanttext.png" width="255" height="190" /></a><b>TIM: What message do you have to supporters and activists in here, who are on your side? How can they help you?</b>

EB: I will tell the people here that we want what they want, life and liberty. I want a good, safe future with peace, justice and freedom for my sons and the next generation. So we need their support to put pressure on the government in the United States and everywhere. We need their support so as not to support Israel government with weapons and not to support them to kill our kids and kill our people. There’s many ways to help and give support. We need you to support us and help us get our freedom.

<b>TIM: Is your next target to bring down the wall?</b>

EB: Not just bringing down the wall. The problem is not the wall. The wall is a small problem. The problem is the occupation.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/telling-our-stories-before-they-are-hijacked-exclusive-interview-with-emad-burnat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dance with the Devil</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/dance-with-the-devil/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=dance-with-the-devil</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/dance-with-the-devil/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Zaid Hassan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3088</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have they not travelled in the land so that they should have hearts with which to feel and ears with which to hear? For indeed it is not the eyes that grow blind – but it is the hearts, which are within the bosoms, that grow blind. - [Sûrah al-Hajj: [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>Have they not travelled in the land so that they should have hearts with which to feel and ears with which to hear? For indeed it is not the eyes that grow blind – but it is the hearts, which are within the bosoms, that grow blind.

- [Sûrah al-Hajj: 46]

“White, brown, yellow and black color is not restricted
You have a self-destructive destiny when you're inflicted
And you'll be one of god's children that fell from the top
There's no diversity because we're burning in the melting pot
So when the devil wants to dance with you, you better say never
Because the dance with the devil might last you forever.”

- Dance with the Devil, Immortal Technique</blockquote>
The devil, Shaitan or Iblis, in the Islamic tradition is the most beautiful of Allah’s angels.

All cultures have their mythologies of evil. People everywhere struggle to grasp and understand the evil that our fellow human beings visit on each other. We are continually asking each other why evil things happen and what this tells us about the nature of creation. These debates re-surface and are recast whenever we witness events of great tragedy.

I read with interest one such recasting after the Boston Bombing. Written by Gavin Shulman, the article published by the Huffington Post asked, “Are the Boston Bombers Just Douchebags?” Shulman then proceeds to deride the bombers as being “kind of lame,” “just kind of shitty, boring bros,” “just a set of Euro-trash tools,” and “just a couple of douchebags.” After deriding the way they looked, Shulman declares that they “they seem like f%$#ing losers.” He finally concludes that “these two were simply a pair of assholes” and that we should forget them as soon as possible.

Reading the article made me think of the first comments made by a classmate of one of the bombers. She recalls, “He was normal,” said Lulu Emmons, who went to Rindge &amp; Latin, the city’s public high school, with Dzhokhar. “He kind of fit in with everyone. Not really close with anyone, but he was friendly.” And finally, “I am just a little shocked. I sat next to this guy. I joked with him. I laughed with him. I had class with him. It is a little crazy,” she said. Then one of his former teachers comments, “If someone were to ask me what the kid was like, I would say he had a heart of gold,” he said. “He was as gracious as possible.”

Then news broke this week about a man, Ariel Castro, in Cleveland. Castro abducted and kept three young women locked in his house for a decade. During this time he raped, starved and probably beat them, fathering at least one child, with an unknown number of miscarriages.

As the full horror of the story broke, once again, people wondered. Castro was well known around the community. People went round for barbeques and he was supposed to be one of the best bass players in Cleveland. One of Castro’s neighbours commented, “He was a nice guy, he would come around and say hi. He gave the kids rides up and down the street on his four-wheeler," he added that “He asked me if I wanted a ride. .. He seemed like he was a good guy to the kids that were here. ... I didn't think anything of it.” A relative was “as blindsided as anyone else.”

How do we reconcile the two pictures we have of these people?

Examined in isolation, neither picture makes sense. Examined together, they tell us a lot about the nature of evil in the world.

In our minds monsters are dark, misshapen and ugly figures. They are not star students or regular guys we hang out with over a barbecue or play bass with. In our minds we instantly recognize evil from its ugliness. The reality is far more disturbing.

The reason Shulman’s article is so plain wrong is because it asks us to look at people who are “losers” or “douchebags” with suspicion. It attempts a causal link between those who are not celebrated in television ads, who are not the beautiful people as potentially evil. It derides those who commit horrific acts as somehow being the losers in society, people who have failed. And most of all, it panders to the illusion that those who commit evil are somehow the misshapen figures in a child’s bad dream.

Yet in too many ways, neither Dzhokhar and Tamerlan Tsarnaev, nor Ariel Castro were “losers” as judged by society. They were mostly regular guys. It’s only after the fact that everyone strains to recall some fact that doesn’t fit, something that would mark them out as evil. But these marks can only be seen in hindsight, never in the moment.

The reality is that monsters are more likely to be affable, beautiful and seductive. The nature of evil is that it does not call us to do evil deeds in the name of the devil. Rather it calls us to do evil in the name of some other goal, be that freedom and justice, or pleasure and power.

If we’re to be vigilant of the evil that exists in all societies, then we have to disenchant ourselves from the image, from the spectacle. We have to wean ourselves off the silly caricatures that mass media sells us, pandering to our desires and telling us what we want to hear.

If we want to recognise the development of evil in our midst, of the corruption of good things into bad things, then surely we will have to take a greater interest in the people around us. We will have to use more than our eyes. Instead, we will have to use our hearts.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/dance-with-the-devil/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friedman&#8217;s Folly and the Islamophobic Razor</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/friedmans-folly-and-the-islamophobic-razor/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=friedmans-folly-and-the-islamophobic-razor</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/friedmans-folly-and-the-islamophobic-razor/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:31:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Vicente Perez</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Columns]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“But we must ask a question only Muslims can answer: What is going on in your community that a critical number of your youth believes that every American military action in the Middle East is intolerable and justifies a violent response, and everything Muslim extremists do to other Muslims is [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote>“<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">But we must ask a question only Muslims can answer: What is going on in your community that a critical number of your youth believes that every American military action in the Middle East is intolerable and justifies a violent response, and everything Muslim extremists do to other Muslims is ignorable and calls for mostly silence?”</span></span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">The quote above comes from one of Thomas Friedman’s recent columns in the New York Times. The piece is riddled with problems but I chose this particular excerpt because it’s an excellent example of what I’d like to call the Islamophobic razor. By this I mean something quite simple: when multiple explanations are possible, the one with the most racist assumptions is taken as the best one. To see what I mean, let’s look at Friedman’s question piece by piece.</span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">We can start with the opening line: </span>
<blockquote>“<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">[W]e must ask a question </span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"><i>only</i></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"> Muslims can answer.” </span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">Friedman begins with the assumption that whatever happened in Boston, and is happening among Muslims throughout the world, has an explanation that “only” Muslims can articulate. The framing is impeccably Islamophobic. Why should we trust Friedman that questions of violence committed by </span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"><i>some </i></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">Muslims is something </span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"><i>all </i></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">Muslims can answer? More specifically, why should we believe that the violence of </span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"><i>some</i></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"> Muslims can be answered by </span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"><i>any</i></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"> Muslims other than the ones who committed it? What is it that Friedman thinks Muslims know about other Muslims who commit violence against civilians? </span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">We can start by recognizing that the very basis for the exclusive nature of the question (“only Muslims can answer) is absurd. Consider it this way. School shootings are overwhelmingly committed by young white males born in the United States. The killings are sufficiently common to say that they raise legitimate security concerns for our children and families. As a young male US-born citizen, should I know anything about school shootings? Many of the youth responsible for the shootings have gun-loving parents. Should male teenagers whose parents own guns know something about the shootings? Try it another way: Should Catholics have an answer for the innumerable cases of rape and sexual assault within the Church? </span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">The answer is simple: no. </span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">Such questions are useless since there’s no reason to believe that people who fall into some category (“teenage white males” or “Catholics”) can account for the actions of others within that category. No one believes being a teenage white male or being a Catholic is sufficient to mean they know why other teenage white males murder or Catholics rape. Unless, of course, you’re Thomas Friedman. Then you can assume Muslims know why other Muslims kill innocent civilians. More precisely, you can rely on the Islamophobic razor. According to this racist logic, “only” Muslims can explain what other Muslims do because Islam tells us what all Muslims do. And by following this logic, you’ve not only closed all other explanations but you’ve ensured that no other questions can be asked, indeed need to be asked. </span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">Let’s now look at Friedman’s actual question: </span>
<blockquote>“<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">What is going on in your community that a critical number of your youth believes that every American military action in the Middle East is intolerable and justifies a violent response, and everything Muslim extremists do to other Muslims is ignorable and calls for mostly silence?” </span></blockquote>
<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">We can start with what Friedman gets right. There is something going on with Muslims. Some Muslims are motivated to commit acts of violence against civilians. That’s about the extent of what he gets right. More than that, I can’t grant him.</span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">So what does he get wrong? </span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">First, what’s “going on in our community” is a problematic statement. Whose community is he talking about? The Muslim population is over 1 billion. Neither I nor any Muslim can account for “what’s going on” in such a diverse world community. Even if he’s talking about the US Muslim community, Friedman’s question is ridiculous. The 9/11 attacks were committed by Muslims from abroad. They were not part of “our community.” The Boston bombers were also born abroad and their connections to any Muslim community are unclear. It’s more accurate to say that the American Muslim community is really a constellation of Muslim </span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;"><i>communities</i></span><span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">. I have no idea what’s going on in Los Angeles, Chicago, or Boston mosques. And there’s a good possibility that Los Angeles Muslims don’t know what’s going on in other Los Angeles mosques. The reason is unsurprising: we’re like any other “community.” Many, if not most, Muslims lead lives that aren’t connected enough to make the kind of community Friedman presumes. And if any Muslims were planning on bombing a marathon, what makes Friedman think I’d have the slightest knowledge about it? Why would they tell anyone?</span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">I should also add that, in quantitative terms, very little violence has actually come from the American Muslim community. While one killing is one too many, the fact of daily gun violence in the US is enough to eclipse the number of killings committed or attempted by American Muslims. In other words, the so-called Muslim menace is anything but a menace if you treat their crimes like you treat any other. </span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">The second part of the question is also deceptive. Friedman is aware that many American Muslims oppose US military policies and violence in the Muslim world. Many of us oppose it publicly and passionately. This does not mean, however, that we believe in any “critical” number that American military violence justifies a violent response. The critical number Friedman is missing here is the ignored members of the Muslim community in America that use education, debate, cultural expression, and protest to express our views. In the America I live in, Muslims are on the radio, writing books, and expressing both their support for, and disagreements with, the US government. Why should the actions of so few Muslims serve to obscure the work of the many Muslims doing exactly what Friedman thinks we should be doing? </span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">In addition to this omission, there are two more profound issues here. First, Friedman is distorting what we really know about Muslims who commit violence. Until now, we actually have little information on what motivated the Boston bombers. One of the brothers is dead and the other has revealed no particular narrative that links his actions with US military actions. Even if it turns out that these two brothers were motivated by US attacks abroad, can their actions alone suffice for holding the entire Muslim community of America accountable for their actions? </span>

<a name="_GoBack"></a> <span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">The second problem with Friedman’s question is that it ignores the fact that the US government operates according to the very logic he condemns. For over a decade, the US military has killed innocent civilians in the Muslim world as if every terrorist attack is “intolerable and justifies a violent response.” Indeed, the war on terror reflects the idea that war is a justified response to the actions of some violent Muslims. Given that we have engaged the Muslim world through war, why should we be surprised that some Muslims have engaged us through war? Isn’t it safe to say that our foreign policy is “radicalized” to the extent that we believe killing innocents is unfortunate but justified?</span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">The final piece to Friedman’s question is perhaps the most offensive if not the most untrue. On what empirical grounds can Friedman possibly claim that Muslims ignore the violence committed by other Muslims? Muslims are not “silent” on the violence in Syria, Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan. I myself published <a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/displacing-masses-in-syria-a-crime-of-commission/">an article</a> discussing the gross violation of human rights committed by the Syrian regime against its population. Muslims are not silent on the reality of Muslim-on-Muslim violence. We’ve debated it, questioned it, and condemned it. Our voices are out there. The question is why pundits like Friedman are ignoring it. Why do Muslim scholars like T.J. Winter, whose discussion on <a href="http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/author/tjwinter/">suicide bombing</a> was published years ago, and Sherman Jackson, who covered the <a href="http://www.lamppostproductions.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/JIHAD_MOD_WLD.pdf">question of jihad</a>, go unnoticed? Why did the <a href="http://www.ammanmessage.com">Amman Message</a> receive so little press? Why does my own publication, The Islamic Monthly, or Muslim blogs like Altmuslim and Altmuslimah, which are unafraid of engaging the most pressing issues facing Muslims today, move so silently in Friedman’s world? The answer is, as usual, simple: he isn’t looking. </span>

<span style="font-family: Georgia,serif;">Friedman’s article is already circulating through all the usual channels. The quote above was cited by US Congressman, Peter King, on Meet the Press while pushing for greater scrutiny of the Muslim American community. I expect that it will go much further among the Islamophobes on Fox News and other right-wing networks. But before it does, we should be careful to avoid letting the flawed logic of Friedman’s Islamophobic razor get any further. We should do exactly what Friedman claims we don’t do: challenge pundits like him to see the folly of their own ignorance. </span>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/friedmans-folly-and-the-islamophobic-razor/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pakistan elections are over: what&#8217;s next?</title>
		<link>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/pakistan-elections-are-over-whats-next/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=pakistan-elections-are-over-whats-next</link>
		<comments>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/pakistan-elections-are-over-whats-next/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 May 2013 03:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Lael Mohib</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/?p=3082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When polls closed on Pakistan’s historic elections this past Saturday, social media posts of political pundits and many Pakistani citizens were generally celebratory. “Democracy wins” read one tweet. “This is democracy for us” read another. To democracies with more tried-and-true electoral systems, judging from Pakistan’s recent elections, it may have [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[When polls closed on Pakistan’s historic elections this past Saturday, social media posts of political pundits and many Pakistani citizens were generally celebratory. “Democracy wins” read one tweet. “This is democracy for us” read another. To democracies with more tried-and-true electoral systems, judging from Pakistan’s recent elections, it may have looked like the country’s democratic system was not winning. There were militant attacks on polling stations in nearly every province, inter-party rivalry resulted in gun fights in the streets of Karachi, and clear evidence of vote-rigging and fraud surfaced. But given Pakistan’s turbulent political history, Saturday’s elections were a relative success. Though official final results have yet to be announced, glimpses of a new political landscape and a burgeoning democracy were revealed in this election process.

Elections proceeded on schedule. Despite the fact that about 30 people were killed in violent incidents on the day (the finale to a reported 130 attacks resulting in about 150 deaths in the last month leading up to the elections), Pakistanis were not deterred. Average nationwide voter turnout was 60 %, the highest it has been in 40 years, compared to just 44 % in the 2008 elections. This enthusiasm was demonstrated by one elderly man who was brought to a polling station Karachi on a stretcher—a video posted online shows people applauding him as he was carried out. Other voters braved long queues and the heat, some waiting in line for hours to cast a vote.

Another major achievement was that for once in Pakistan’s history, its military was an important facilitator, instead of an interference, in this process of transitioning from one civilian leader to another. For example, this was demonstrated by the presence of military troops deployed by the caretaker government at some high-risk polling stations.

One major, but perhaps expected, setback was fraud. Concerns over fraud and corruption were largely downplayed in the international media as militant attacks dominated headlines in the build up to the elections. But amateur videos uploaded to the Internet seemed to indicate the occurrence of vote-rigging and ballot box stuffing at several polling stations, particularly in Karachi where fraud and violent incidents caused several polling stations to shut down. Various levels of fraud may have been widespread across the country on the day, though with limited media access in some areas, such as Balochistan, it is difficult to know to what extent fraud distorted the results.

However, the independent Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP), was quick to acknowledge the fraud and moved quickly to address it. Following complaints in an area of Karachi, the ECP’s Secretary Ishtiak Ahmad announced that re-polling would take place in 43 stations in one constituency in the next ten days.

Though former cricket player Imran Khan will not be the country’s next prime minister, hisPakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party did cover a lot of ground in this election for a relative newcomer to mainstream politics. Currently, they are neck-and-neck with the country’s largest political party, the Pakistan’s People Party (PPP) for seats in the National Assembly, both parties winning about 30 seats each. The party also took the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province from the Awami National Party (ANP), which will provide a testing ground for PTI’s policy promises on hot topics such as demanding a stop to drone strikes and countering terrorism.

The ‘youth vote’ that the PTI was banking on to sweep the elections did in fact turn out in droves to vote across the country, though their vote was too fragmented to consolidate a win for PTI. But the PTI’s major success was apparent even before the polls opened. The party managed to engage and inspire a relatively apolitical demographic across the country, the urban upper and middle class. The PTI has entered the political arena as major third player in mainstream politics, rising up through popular nation-wide support and, most importantly, across ethnic or regional lines. This is in contrast to the victorious Pakistan Muslim League Nawaz (PML-N), which appears to have won the national elections mainly by cleaning up in the heavily weighted province of Punjab where it draws most of its support (118 of its 126 seats won so far in the National Assembly are in Punjab). The PTI has now vowed to play a strong opposition role in the Parliament, poising itself for the 2018 elections.

But for the next five years, as widely anticipated, Nawaz Sharif of the PML-N is set to be prime minister for the third time, making a remarkable comeback to power after years in exile in Saudi Arabia. It is projected by many news agencies that PML-N will emerge with a majority of seats, picked up through alliances with independent parties, thus avoiding the complex process of coalition-building.

Sharif’s biggest and most immediate challenges will be to reinvigorate the economy, solve the energy crisis, and deal with Pakistan’s internal terrorism crisis while also balancing foreign relations. Known to be a realist, he has already promised a tall order, making public statements post-election that he will fight extremism, improve relations with the US and Afghanistan, and even invited Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh to his inauguration ceremony. Under his party’s rule, Punjab province has undergone significant infrastructural and economic development and enjoyed relative peace over the past years, so he does have a proven track record in that sector.

However, any improvements the PML-N make will appear amplified in the wake of the PPP’srule, which failed to boost the economy or deal with domestic terrorism. One political commentator, academic and intellectual Adil Najam, tweeted “the great political story of the night not PML-N or PTI, its PPP.” Remarkably, the PPP, the country’s largest national party, only managed to gain 31 seats (as opposed to 91 in 2008), and all but one in their regional stronghold of Sindh.

This is indeed democracy, a massive national undertaking inherently full of challenges and potential disorder, but in which parties and politicians can be made or broken from one election to the next depending on the demands and needs of a country’s people. While the country did suffer some significant growing pains in these elections, it was nonetheless a major and historic growth spurt for Pakistan’s young democracy.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.theislamicmonthly.com/pakistan-elections-are-over-whats-next/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

 Served from: www.theislamicmonthly.com @ 2013-05-25 01:51:31 by W3 Total Cache -->